
washingtontimes.com

Abortion and the Supreme Court:
Advancing the Culture of Death
National Conference of Catholic Bishops
November 15, 2000
In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court
decisions Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton ushered in legalized
abortion on request nationwide. By denying protection to unborn children
throughout pregnancy, these rulings dealt a devastating blow to the most
fundamental human right -- the right to life.
In its 1992 Casey decision the Court could not muster a majority for
the view that Roe and Doe were rightly decided. Yet the
controlling opinion insisted that even if these decisions were wrong, they
must stand because Americans have now fashioned their way of life on the
availability of abortion.
No more damning indictment of the coarsening effects of Roe on our national
character can be imagined. This ruling has helped to create an abortion
culture:
- in which many Americans turn to the destruction of innocent life as an
answer to personal, social and economic problems;
- which encourages many young men to feel no sense of responsibility to
take care of the children they helped to create and no loyalty to their
child's mother;
- in which men who do feel responsibility for their children are left
helpless to protect them;
- whose casualties include not only the unborn but the countless thousands
of women who have suffered physically, emotionally and spiritually from the
deadly effects of abortion;
- in which fathers, grandparents, siblings, indeed entire families suffer
and are forever changed by the loss of a child.
The principles of Roe and Doe have also been used to call
into question the right to life of newborn children with disabilities and
adults with serious illnesses. In 1997 the Court denied a constitutional
"right" to assisted suicide, perhaps realizing that its legal reasoning on
abortion must be reined in if it was not to exert a further corrosive effect
on the protection of life after birth.
However, any hope that the Court might reverse course on abortion itself was
shattered this year. In Stenberg v. Carhart, a majority of five
justices ruled that even the killing of a child mostly born alive is protected
by what the Court called "the woman's right to choose."
This decision has brought our legal system to the brink of endorsing
infanticide. Already the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action
League has used this decision's expansion of the logic of Roe to attack
congressional efforts to reaffirm that a child completely born alive is a
legal person. Such a policy, said this group, is "in direct conflict with
Roe," which "clearly states that women have the right to choose prior to
fetal viability." The euphemism of "the right to choose," routinely used to
avoid mentioning abortion, is now being used to justify killing outside the
womb.
Ultimately this issue is not about "when life begins," or even exclusively
about abortion. Modern medicine has brought us face-to-face with the continuum
of human life from conception onwards, and the inescapable reality of human
life in the womb. Yet our legal system, and thus our national culture, is
being pressed to declare that human life has no inherent worth, that the value
of human life can be assigned by the powerful and that the protection of the
vulnerable is subject to the arbitrary choice of others. The lives of all who
are marginalized by our society are endangered by such a trend.
As religious leaders, we know that human life is our first gift from a loving
Father and the condition for all other earthly goods. We know that no human
government can legitimately deny the right to life or restrict it to certain
classes of human beings. Therefore the Court's abortion decisions deserve only
to be condemned, repudiated and ultimately reversed.
As United States citizens, we deplore the fact that our nation is at risk of
forgetting the promise made to generations yet unborn by our Declaration of
Independence: that our nation would respect life as first among the
inalienable rights bestowed on us by our Creator. To uphold that promise, the
nation's founders pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.
We must do no less.
We recommit ourselves to the long and difficult task of reversing the Supreme
Court's abortion decisions -- Stenberg v. Carhart as well as Roe v.
Wade itself, which laid the foundation for a right to take innocent life.
We invite people of good will to explore with us all avenues for legal reform,
including a constitutional amendment.
Building a culture of life in our society will also require efforts reaching
beyond legal reform. We rededicate our Church to education, public policy
advocacy, pastoral care, and fervent prayer for the cause of human life, as
articulated in our Pastoral Plan for Pro-Life Activities. In so doing,
we hope to help bring an end to the abortion culture in our society. In the
words of Pope John Paul II, we hope and pray "that our time, marked by all too
many signs of death, may at last witness the establishment of a new culture of
life, the fruit of the culture of truth and of love" (The Gospel of Life,
77).
Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20017-1194 (202) 541-3070
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Catholic Organizations Urge
Senate To Uphold Conscience Protection On Abortion
WASHINGTON (February 23, 2005)– In a letter to the U.S. Senate, leaders
of three Catholic organizations have urged an overwhelming vote against
rescinding the Hyde/Weldon Conscience Protection Amendment. This amendment
protects the rights of health care providers from governmental
discrimination because they decline to provide, pay for, provide coverage
of, or refer for abortions.
The Hyde/Weldon amendment, approved last December as part of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, is an “important safeguard for rights of
conscience,” the leaders said. But it will be under renewed attack, they
cautioned, when Senator Barbara Boxer offers a motion to rescind the law
before the end of April.
“This matter of conscience rights should be an area of common ground among
Senators who disagree on the issue of abortion itself,” the letter said.
“Surely, if ‘pro-choice’ has any meaning, it encompasses protection for a
choice not to be involved in abortion against one’s will.”
The letter was signed by Msgr. William P. Fay, General Secretary, United
States Conference of Catholic Bishops; Sister Carol Keehan, DC,
Chairperson of the Board of Trustees, Catholic Health Association of the
United States; and Steven White, MD, President, Catholic Medical
Association.
The leaders noted that the appropriateness of laws protecting
conscientious objection to abortion was acknowledged in the Supreme
Court’s Doe v. Bolton decision, the companion case to Roe v. Wade, and
that the right of conscience is recognized by the laws of forty-seven
states and in many federal laws.
Since 1996 a federal law has protected “health care entities,” including
individual physicians and medical residents as well as residency programs,
from discrimination at the hands of federal, state or local, government
when they decline to provide or refer for abortions or abortion training.
Some have suggested, however, that this law covers only the entities it
explicitly mentions, and only in the context of the training program.
“These supposed loopholes in current law have underscored the need for a
more inclusive national policy protecting all health care providers who
choose not to participate in abortions,” the letter continued. “Closing
these irrational loopholes is what the Hyde/Weldon amendment does--and
despite exaggerated charges by opponents, that is all it does.
“Current law…already allows individual and institutional health care
providers to freely choose to provide abortions, and the Hyde/Weldon
Conscience Protection Amendment does not alter this reality. All the
amendment does is help ‘level the playing field’ for those who decline to
provide abortions,” the letter said.
“If you hold a pro-life position, this will be an easy vote. If you see
yourself as ‘pro-choice,’ this is an opportunity to affirm that your
commitment to ‘choice’ includes respect for everyone’s choices on
abortion. We hope for an overwhelming Senate vote against rescinding the
Hyde/Weldon Conscience Protection Amendment.”
NOTE: The full letter will be posted at
www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/abortion/hydeweldonletter2.pdf
Office of Media Relations
© USCCB.
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
|